Safe Preparation and Delivery of Graphite Targets for 14 C Analysis
Procedures of Bravho Lab at Bologna University
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9246057 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura Tassoni (0000-0002-0110-3656), Bernd Kromer (0000-0003-1058-4436), Ronny Friedrich (0000-0001-5199-1957), Lukas Wacker (0000-0002-8215-2678), Maurizio Cattani (0000-0003-2607-3657), Michael Friedrich (0000-0003-1614-0959), Dragana Paleček (0000-0002-6556-390X), Enrico Pelloni, Kehua Peng, Michael Eric Thomas, Sahra Talamo (0000-0002-2406-3132) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1368-1378 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Radiocarbon (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-8222 • E-ISSN: 1945-5755 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/rdc.2023.43 |
| OpenAlex | W4385201161 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Nowadays, most radiocarbon ( 14 C) laboratories can reliably avoid and remove any possible sample contamination during the pretreatment of organic samples (e.g., bones, charcoal, or trees) thanks to a series of methods commonly used by the radiocarbon community. However, what about the final step, the storage of graphite? Rarely do the laboratories produce their graphite and ship it as pressed targets to accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facilities for measurement. Pressed graphite in aluminum targets are vulnerable to contamination, and during shipment or storage, exogenous carbon can be introduced again. Here we report a test on various archaeological sample materials from different environments and different periods (from the past three millennia to the Middle Paleolithic period). We transformed them into graphite, pressed the graphite into targets and sent them to two different AMS laboratories to be dated. We observe that packing details of the targets, extended shipment and storage time may lead to contamination which can be avoided by appropriate packaging in tight metal cans and sealed in vacuum bags. Close cooperation and coordination between our chemistry laboratory and the AMS facilities, high standards in contamination removal, and efficient measurement planning enabled us to obtain reliable 14 C ages within a short time
Accelerator mass spectrometry · Archaeology · Carbon fibers · Charcoal · Chromatography · Composite material · Contamination · Graphite · Metallurgy · Radiocarbon dating · Radiochemistry · Sample Preparation · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Chemistry · Environmental Science · History · Materials Science · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
“Here we go again”
Debates over Palaeolithic chronology – the reliability of 14C is confirmed
Contamination on AMS Sample Targets by Modern Carbon is Inevitable
Radiocarbon Dating of “Old” Charcoal Using a Wet Oxidation, Stepped-Combustion Procedure
Analysis of Bone “Collagen” Extraction Products for Radiocarbon Dating
Behavioral Variability in ABA Chemical Pretreatment Close to the 14 C Age Limit
A Comparison of Cellulose Extraction and ABA Pretreatment Methods for AMS 14 C Dating of Ancient Wood
Alternative Methods for Cellulose Preparation for AMS Measurement
ABA and ABOx Radiocarbon Cross-Dating on Charcoal from Middle Pleniglacial Loess Deposits in Austria, Moravia, and Western Ukraine
AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Paleolithic-Aged Charcoal from Europe and the Mediterranean Rim Using ABOx-SC
European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |