Rethinking neoliberalism after the Polanyian turn

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9255880
AutoresSamuel Knafo (0000-0001-9374-8170, University of Sussex, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume80
Fascículo2
Páginas194-219
Data de publicação2022-04-03
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoReview of Social Economy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00346764.2020.1733644
OpenAlexW3007343482
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas65

The last two decades have seen an explosion of writings about neoliberalism insisting on the role of the state as a key architect of market dynamics. Drawing substantially from the work of Karl Polanyi, this literature has emphasised in various ways the socially constructed nature of neoliberalism. But as I argue, conceptual flaws in Polanyi’s conception of 19th liberal governance have helped perpetuate an ongoing reliance on the notion of the Market despite the recognition that there is no such thing as a self-regulated Market. Criticising the turn to Polanyi, I show how this has directed our gaze towards the rhetorical claims of neoliberal governance, at the expense of a reflection on its institutional features. The article then suggests avenues for reconfiguring the study of neoliberalism without recourse to the problematic notion of the Market

Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Neoclassical economics · Neoliberalism (international relations) · Political economy · Political science · Rhetorical question · Sociology · State (computer science) · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Economy and Marxism