On Gendered Economics

Rejoinder

Bibliographic Data

ID9256845
AuthorsJulie A Nelson (0000-0003-2399-440X)
Year1995
Volume53
Issue1
Pages133-139
Publication date1995-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Social Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00346769500000006
OpenAlexW2079742938
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

This reply further clarifies the differences between the vision of ‘humanistic economics’ as outlined by Mark Lutz and Kenneth Lux, and the feminist economics envisioned by the author. The author's (previous) assertion that Lutz and Lux set up hierarchical dualisms of reason over nature and reason over passion is shown to be supported by passages from the core theoretical section of their book. Feminist insights into the importance of families and the content of value hierarchies is further explained. It is suggested that, instead of elevating self-actualization above material needs, it would be more helpful to think of value hierarchies as operating within three distinct dimensions: agency, affiliation, and living standards

Agency (philosophy) · Assertion · Core (optical fiber) · Economics · Epistemology · Humanism · Passion · Political science · Positive economics · Section (typography) · Set (abstract data type) · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub