Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Métodos de estimação de variância em amostras provenientes de inquéritos domiciliares

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9260591
AutoresMaria Cecilia Goi Porto Alves (0000-0003-4357-9473, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará), Nilza Nunes Da Silva (Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará)
Ano2007
Volume41
Fascículo6
Páginas938-946
Data de publicação2007-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRevista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910
EditoraFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/s0034-89102007000600008
PMID17992355
OpenAlexW4254363652
SCIELO_PIDS0034-89102007000600008
IdiomaPT
Citações recebidas1

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of sampling errors is essential for correctly interpreting the results from household surveys and evaluating their sampling designs. The composition of household samples used in surveys gives rise to situations of complex estimation. In this light, the study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the performance of the variance estimators in surveys carried out among urban populations in Brazil. METHODS: The reference population was the sample drawn by the Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados Estatísticos (SEADE - State Statistical Data Analysis System Foundation) for carrying out an employment and unemployment survey in the metropolitan region of São Paulo. Three techniques were used for estimating variance: Taylor linearization and Jackknife and BRR replication. Repeated samples were selected from the reference population, using stratified cluster sampling in two stages (census tracts and households). Three different designs were used and 2,000 samples were drawn within each design. To obtain an estimator ratio, the accuracy of the variance estimators was evaluated by means of the mean square error and the confidence interval coverage. RESULTS: According to the mean square error, the three techniques provided similar accuracy. The bias ratios were approximately 0.10, for the smaller samples. The confidence interval coverage indicated that the confidence levels observed were lower than what was set (95%), and were around 90% for the smaller samples. CONCLUSIONS: The variance estimators showed similar performance with regard to accuracy and confidence interval coverage. The bias was irrelevant in relation to the magnitude of the standard error. Although the real confidence levels were lower than the nominal levels for normal distribution, the changes did not prevent construction of interval estimates with reasonable confidence

Biology · Humanities · Physics · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Philosophy · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • Inquérito de saúde

    Open Access•Neuber José Segri, Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar et al.•Revista de Saúde Pública•2010

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,06
Intervalo de citações2010 - 2010 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae