Face Him Like a Briton

Tiger Hunting, Imperialism, and British Masculinity in Colonial India, 1800-1875

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9293173
AutoresJoseph Sramek (autor correspondente)
Ano2006
Volume48
Fascículo4
Páginas659-680
Data de publicação2006-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoVictorian Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0042-5222 • E-ISSN: 1527-2052
EditoraIndiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2979/vic.2006.48.4.659
OpenAlexW2143190522
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas39
Referências citadas20

By 1864, when British Army officer Walter Campbell offered this advice, tigers and tiger hunting had become invested with several potent meanings. As royal beasts and kings and masters of the jungle, tigers had been closely associated historically with Indian and other Southeast Asian rulers (Wessing 27), associations of which many nineteenth-century Britons were keenly aware. Not only did many Britons seek to emulate various Mughal emperors for whom tiger hunting was an element of kingship, but on the way to presuming themselves the New Mughals they had to outdo various regional rulers such as Mysore's Tipu Sultan (who held power from 1782 to 1799) who also employed tigers as powerful symbols of their rule (Brittlebank 140-46). Tigers also represented for the British all that was wild and untamed in the Indian natural world. Thus, the curious late Victorian and Edwardian spectacle of British royals and other dignitaries being photographed standing aside dead tiger carcasses depicted the staging of the successful conquest of Indian nature by virile imperialists (MacKenzie 47). More generally, tiger hunting was an important symbol in the construction of British imperial and masculine identities during the nineteenth century. Precisely because tigers were dangerous and powerful beasts, tiger hunting represented a struggle with fearsome nature that needed to be resolutely faced like a Briton, as Campbell put it (162). Only by successfully vanquishing tigers would Britons prove their manliness and their fitness to rule over Indians. Much has been written about the place of the tiger in Indian and other Southeast Asian cultures during the precolonial period

Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Face (sociological concept · Masculinity · Social science · Sociology · Tiger · Gender Studies · History · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Philippine History and Culture · South Asian Studies and Conflicts