Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Images of Artisans on Etruscan and Italic Gems

Bibliographic Data

ID9318676
AuthorsLaura Ambrosini (0000-0003-3185-7480, Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo Antico, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume17
Issue2
Publication date2014-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEtruscan Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1080-1960 • E-ISSN: 2163-8217
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/etst-2014-0019
OpenAlexW2317881922
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

As the ancient sources make clear, the Etruscans excelled in many fields of artistic craft, especially in the production of jewelry and bronzes. They also produced numerous gems, a small number of which show artisans—blacksmiths, carpenters, shipbuilders, sculptors, etc.—at work. Although the similarity between these artisans and mythological craftsmen such as Hephaestus and Daedalus, along with mythical characters such as Argos and Epeios, leads to problems of identification in cases where the Etruscan gem does not bear an inscription identifying the character depicted, iconographic comparisons can be used as a guide for reliable identifications. In this article, I present the evidence for the depiction of artisans of all types, as well as laborers/quarrymen, on Etruscan gems. This subject matter was most common in the third to first centuries BCE, including on gems related to Italic and/or Roman-Republican production. Some crafts appear much more frequently than others: for example, the men employed in the manufacture of perfumes and leather, and the dyeing of fabrics, are absent, while those engaged in the production of weapons, ships, or sculpture appear more regularly. In addition, female artisans are absent, despite women’s known activities in the crafts of weaving and leather tanning, to name just two of their occupations. Because of the absence of workshop scenes, it is unlikely that the owners of these gems (i.e., craftsmen) chose this subject matter as a means of self-representation, although, in some cases, they may have wanted to elevate their status by alluding to a legendary craftsman. It is also possible that some of the images on the gems—in particular, blacksmiths making weapons and carpenters building ships—reference the activities of the person who bought the gem (i.e., military and naval activities, both for trade and for war)

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Art history · Craft · Depiction · Handicraft · Literature · Mythology · Representation (politics · Sculpture · Sociology · Subject matter · Visual arts · Weaving · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Engineering · History

  • Gems, Cameos, and Social Practice

    Jörn Lang•Oxford Handbook of Roman Imagery…•2021

  • Unpublished Gems in Various Collections

    Gisela M A Richter, Gisela Μ Α Richter•American Journal of Archaeology•1957

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae