Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploiting excavation archives

Herculaneum from 1927 to 1961 as a case-study

Bibliographic Data

ID9319006
AuthorsNicolas Monteix (0000-0001-9060-8260, Institut Universitaire de France, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume29
Pages423-437
Publication date2016-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Roman Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1047-7594 • E-ISSN: 2331-5709
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1047759400072214
OpenAlexW2545099113
LanguageEN
Citations received1

“Questi giornali di scavo di Ercolano sono una miseria di forma e di sostanza” “The only source of information for most of the finds of the site [Pompeii] remains the pages of the Giornali degli Scavi ” With the multiplication of excavations, archaeological research (and even rescue archaeology) increasingly faces sites previously explored and thereby has to deal with documentation made with different methods and of different scopes than those of today. Beyond the historiographical issues and differences in ways of describing the past as viewed from the present, such an archival documentation is generally fragmentary, often scattered between various institutions or in private archives. The aim of this paper is to contribute to a debate on an important issue: how might we best make use of previous material, from archival documents to publications? Herculaneum can exemplify the main processes one might face while studying a site excavated in the past. Initially explored through tunnels, it was excavated in open-area excavations in four periods (1828-55; 1869-75; 1927-61; 1996-98). Most of the city as we know it was uncovered by A. Maiuri (1886-1963) while he was Soprintendente and director of the Museum of Naples (1924-61). He managed to pass himself off as the only excavator of Herculaneum, and such a view was consolidated by the (incomplete) publication of his excavations in 1958. Up until the late 1990s, anything written about Herculaneum relied on his synthesis, with only a few re-interpretations based on observations made on a site that had been restored and presented by him. S. Mols was the first to use other sources to understand better the context of the wooden furniture discovered throughout the town, namely the daybooks ( Giornale degli scavi di Ercolano [henceforth GSE ]) composed during the excavation. Since then, slowly but surely, many of those involved in the study of Herculaneum started using those diaries, hoping to have a more complete and less subjective perception of the excavation — at least, one less influenced by Maiuri

Archaeology · Art · Documentation · Excavation · Face (sociological concept · Historiography · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Archaeological Research and Protection · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · History

  • The Porta Stabia Neighborhood at Pompeii Volume I

    Steven J R Ellis, Allison L C Emmerson et al.•Porta Stabia Neighborhood at…•2023

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae