On spatiality in Tartu–Moscow cultural semiotics
The semiotic subject
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9329643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anti Randviir (University of Tartu, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 137-160 |
| Publication date | 2007-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sign Systems Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1406-4243 • E-ISSN: 1736-7409 |
| Publisher | University of Tartu (PUBLISHER • EE) |
| DOI | 10.12697/sss.2007.35.1-2.05 |
| OpenAlex | W3176114754 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 1 |
The article views the development of the Tartu–Moscow semiotic school from the analysis of texts to the study of spatial entities (semiosphere being most well known of them). It comes to light that ‘culture’ and ‘space’ have been such notions in Tartu–Moscow School to which, for instance, the ‘semiosphere’ does not add much. There are studied possibilities to join Uexküll’s and Lotman’s basic concepts (as certain grounds of Estonian semiotics) with Tartu–Moscow School’s treatment of culture and space through the notion of ‘semiotic subject’. Such an approach allows to see transdisciplinarity, which has come to issue only during the last decade, already in the first conceptions of Tartu–Moscow School where transdisciplinarity revealed itself in the symbiotic use of ‘culture’ and ‘space’
Epistemology · Estonian · Library science · Linguistics · Semiotics · Semiotics of culture · Sociology · Space (punctuation) · Subject (documents · Transdisciplinarity · Computer Science · European Linguistics and Anthropology · Philosophy
Time in Spatial Metalanguage
La frontière du signe
Vacuous interlocutors as hieratic proxies in the sacrosphere of Andalusian flamenco saeta
Fifty volumes of Sign Systems Studies
Affectivization of borders in the digital sphere
Inside Facebook’s semiosphere. How social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization
Toward a reterritorialization of cultural theory
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2022 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |