The Attitudes of the Secular Historians of the Age of Justinian Towards the Classical Past

I shall begin with a definition. I am dealing with ‘secular historians,’ and thus I am excluding ecclesiastical history, and chronography. The second of these two genres, chronography, continued a tradition which goes back as far as Thucydides' contemporary, Hellanicus, but under a Christian empire it acquired a Christian bias and dropped any pretence of literary style. ‘Ecclesiastical history,’ which, as far as we know, was invented by Eusebius of Caesarea, and displays a somewhat unclassical passion for documentation, dealt with the church and history as it affected the church. Its presuppositions about historical causation were Christian. The secular historians, on the other hand, continued the classical traditions of historiography begun by Herodotus and Thucydides, and their subject matter was war and politics, and the cross between the two, which was diplomacy

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Diplomacy · Empire · Epistemology · Historiography · Literature · Passion · Political science · Politics · Presupposition · Style (visual arts · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

• Rome, China, and the Barbarians

  Open Access•Randolph B Ford•Rome, China, and the Barbarians•2020

  Add to list

• Priscus of Panium, Fragment I b

  Open Access•E A Thompson•The Classical Quarterly•1945

  Add to list

• Olympiodorus of Thebes

  Open Access•E A Thompson•The Classical Quarterly•1944

  Add to list

• Christianity and Tradition in the Historiography of the Late Empire

  Open Access•Averil Averil, Alan Cameron•The Classical Quarterly•1964

  Add to list