Every place is an archive

Environmental history and the interpretation of physical evidence

Bibliographic Data

ID9333332
AuthorsWilliam J Turkel (0000-0003-4734-9894, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume10
Issue2
Pages259-276
Publication date2006-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRethinking History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1364-2529 • E-ISSN: 1470-1154
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13642520600649507
OpenAlexW2024497059
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited17

Practitioners of environmental history often turn to the interpretation of material traces to support their arguments about the past. This kind of unwritten evidence—a footprint is a mundane example—signifies a past event by virtue of a causal and/or physical connection with it. Here a series of case studies is used to explore the analogy between environmental historians' interpretation of physical evidence and the interpretive practices of geologists, foresters, archaeologists, forensic scientists and others who also reconstruct the past from similar clues. In thinking about this kind of interpretive work, students of historical methodology have often referred to the historian as a kind of detective or scientist. These two modes of inquiry have different concomitants and consequences. Interpretation is always part of a wider struggle to determine the future. By carefully considering the roles that material traces play in historical consciousness, we are led to a new way of thinking about the possibilities of environmental history

Analogy · Consciousness · Environmental history · Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Interpretation (philosophy · Sociology · Virtue · American Environmental and Regional History · Archaeology and Natural History · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub