The Liability of Business Partners in Athenian Law

The Dispute Between Lycon and Megacleides ([Dem.] 52.20–1)

Bibliographic Data

ID9334306
AuthorsEdward M Harris (0009-0007-6123-239X, Brooklyn College, corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume39
Issue2
Pages339-343
Publication date1989-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s000983880003740x
OpenAlexW2089800929
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited4

One of the most striking features of Athenian laws regulating commercial activities is the absence of any concept akin to the modern legal notion of the partnership or corporation. Despite the presence in Athenian society of numerous koinoniai , groups of individuals cooperating for some purpose, be it commercial or otherwise, Athenian law concerned itself solely with individual persons and did not recognize the separate legal existence of collective entities. And just as Athenian law did not recognize the legal existence of partnerships or corporations, it also did not possess the notion of corporate liability. This meant that if someone entered into an agreement with a group of individuals and one of those individuals violated the terms of the agreement, the plaintiff proceeded only against the individual who acted contrary to the agreement, not against the group as a whole. If the plaintiff won his suit, he only had a right to receive compensation from the defendant's private property; he did not have a claim on all the funds held in common by the group

Business · Compensation (psychology · Corporation · Law and economics · Liability · Plaintiff · Political science · Property (philosophy · Restitution · Sociology · Unjust enrichment · Ancient Near East History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub