Ideology and Oral Traditions
Listening to the Voices ‘From Below’
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9339207 |
|---|---|
| Autores | C A Hamilton, Clive Hamilton (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1987 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Páginas | 67-86 |
| Data de publicação | 1987-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | History in Africa (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0361-5413 • E-ISSN: 1558-2744 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3171833 |
| OpenAlex | W2008938998 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
From the time of the translation into English of Jan Vansina's Oral Tradition in 1965, the use of oral traditions as historical sources has become an increasingly technical exercise. Historians of the non-literate societies of Africa in particular have been alterted to, among others, such things as “floating gaps” and “hour-glass effects” in traditions, elongated and collapsed genealogies, the peculiarities and fallibility of human memory, the overlaying of oral traditions with successive ruling group histories, and the functioning of oral traditions as cultural charters. Some scholars consider this ‘reification of method’ to have wrought a tool increasingly honed for historical analysis, able to lay bare within oral tradition historical facts, consistent within themselves and with other oral traditions. Others argue that the elaborateness of the methodology reflects the inherently unreliable nature of oral traditions as historical sources. They suggest that, at best, oral traditions are able to provide reliable data only about the interests of a particular group at the particular moment when they were recorded. This paper addresses the debate over the status of oral traditions as historical sources, with particular reference to the use of traditions in the illumination of the precolonial past. Drawing on some of the insights of the new social historians concerning ideology and first-hand oral testimony, it examines the relationship between ideology and oral traditions in non-literate societies. The argument developed here is that, far from simply representing the interests of a particular group, oral traditions often reflect ideological struggles between the rulers and ruled in a society
Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Ideology · Oral history · Oral tradition · Political science · Politics · Reification (Marxism · Sociology · African history and culture studies · Anthropology · Caribbean history, culture, and politics · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · History · Law · Medicine · Philosophy
‘Were they half civilized?’ Knowledge and Reminiscence in the Maloti-Drakensberg
‘Living by Fluidity’
Italian Memories/African Memories of Colonialism
The Creation of the Zulu Kingdom, 1815–1828
Order out of chaos
Outlaws, Anxiety, and Disorder in Southern Africa
Sangalan Oral Traditions as Philosophy and Ideologies
Contradictions at the Heart of the Canon
Chiefs and Other Great Female Ancestors
Watch the Waves of the Sea”
The Origins of the Benin Kingship in the Works of Jacob Egharevba
The long southern African past
Land Reform for a Landless Chief in South Africa
The concept of ideology
People's history and socialist theory
The Invention Of Tradition
Oral Traditions
The Boundaries of History in Oral Performance
Kings, Lists, and History in Kasanje
Can a Blind Man Really know an Elephant? Lessons on the Limitations of Oral Tradition from Paul Irwin's Liptako Speaks
Liptako Speaks
Liptako Speaks
Remembrance of Things Past
The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays
Oral traditions
Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology∗
The Chronology of Oral Tradition
Is Elegance Proof? Structuralism and African History
Leipoldt's valley community
The Political Unconscious
Swazi Royal Ritual
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,39 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1993 - 2023 (31) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |