The rhetorical analysis of the letter to the Galatians
1995-2005
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9345704 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Francois Tolmie (0000-0002-4804-3523, University of the Free State, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Theologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1015-8758 • E-ISSN: 2309-9089 |
| Publisher | University of the Free State (PUBLISHER • ZA) |
| DOI | 10.4314/actat.v28i2.52339 |
| OpenAlex | W2026350335 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Since the publication of Betz’s article (1975) and his commentary on Galatians (1979) much research has been done on the rhetorical analysis of the Letter to the Galatians. This article presents an overview of the rhetorical analyses of Galatians from 1995 to 2005. It concludes by highlighting five characteristics of such analyses: 1. The rigid application of “the” ancient rhetorical system is on the decline; 2. Scholars who still use insights from ancient rhetoric do so in a much more nuanced way, quite often presuppose a wider background, and are more interested in functions than in categories; 3. There has been a notable increase in the use of rhetorical approaches that were not based on ancient rhetoric; 4. The fact that Galatians is a letter has received more serious consideration; 5. A new issue that has been raised is the applicability of an “evaluative” approach to Paul’s argumentation and persuasive strategy
Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Linguistics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Law, logistics, and international trade · Philosophy
Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament
Die Kunst der Argumentation bei Paulus
Paul's Argumentation in Galatians 1–2
Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament
The Literary Composition and Function of Paul's Letter to the Galatians
Arguing Like an Apocalypse
Vergeblich bemüht’ (Gal 4.11)
The Rhetorical Outline for Galatians
Die Botschaft der Form
| Highly cited | No |
|---|