Seaborne Raids in Periclean Strategy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9345813 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H D Westlake (The King's College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1945 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 75-84 |
| Publication date | 1945-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800022618 |
| OpenAlex | W2071944014 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Although the decision of Pericles to abandon Attica to devastation in 431 has often been severely criticized, the conviction of Thucydides that his defensive strategy was sound has been widely accepted during the last half-century. On the other hand, the offensive side of his strategic plan, consisting mainly of using his fleet to raid coastal districts of the Peloponnese, has tended to be dismissed as unimportant by modern writers, while a few have condemned it as pointless and wasteful. Because Thucydides devotes so little space to these raids, it is tempting to regard them as minor operations, but his careful record of the naval and military resources engaged, together with his statement that the force which Pericles commanded in 430 was approximately equal to that sent to Sicily in 415 (6. 31. 2–3), shows that they were on a substantial scale. Their influence upon the course of the war was slight, but if Periclean strategy is to be fully appreciated, it is clearly important to inquire why they were undertaken
Archaeology · Conviction · Military strategy · Offensive · Operations research · Plan (archaeology · Political science · Classical Antiquity Studies · Engineering · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2025 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |