Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Common Errors, Common Readers

Thomas Browne's Pseudodoxia Epidemica and the Scientific Public, 1646–ca. 1800

Bibliographic Data

ID9363391
AuthorsHarriet Phillips (0000-0003-4038-7652, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume117
Issue1
Pages151-200
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3738 • E-ISSN: 1543-0383
PublisherUniversity of North Carolina Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/sip.2020.0005
OpenAlexW2999024605
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

Thomas Browne's Pseudodoxia Epidemica (1646–72) is a landmark in the public understanding of science. This essay analyzes 120 copies of Pseudodoxia to uncover its readership between 1646 and about 1800. As this essay argues, this readership was closely engaged with the text and keen to participate in the debates it explored: more than 70 percent of the inspected copies are annotated. Many of these annotations correct, augment, or organize the original text, drawing on both personal experience and experiment and current philosophical writing to do so. This evidence attests not only to the depth of Browne's readership, in terms of its scientific and informational literacy, but also to its breadth. Annotated copies are dispersed across the anglophone world and reveal a culturally and socially diverse audience. Crucially, they also show the extent of substantial and informed engagement with questions of natural philosophy outside known intellectual networks, demonstrating the existence of a serious "scientific public" in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries

Art · Audience measurement · Literacy · Literature · Media studies · Natural (archaeology · Political science · Sociology · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · Law · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Error, Sprawl and Epistemological Poise in Thomas Browne

    Kevin Killeen•Études anglaises•2024

  • The Assimilating Fancy

    Jessica Wolfe•Études anglaises•2024

  • Knowledge and the Public Interest, 1575–1725

    Open Access•Vera Keller•Knowledge and the Public…•2015

  • Too Much to Know

    Ann M Blair, Trevor Cook•Renaissance and Reformation•2011

  • Reading Revolutions

    Kevin Sharpe, John Considine•Renaissance and Reformation•2000

  • Rereading the English Common Reader

    Jonathan Rose•Journal of the History of Ideas•1992

  • The Department of Hybrid Books

    William Sherman, Heather Wolfe•Journal of Medieval and Early…•2015

  • Pump and Circumstance

    Open Access•Steven Shapin•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • To Know, To Fly, To Conjure

    Open Access•Julie Robin Solomon•Renaissance Quarterly•1991

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae