Pointing to the Ahmarian. Lithic Technology and the El-Wad Points of Al-Ansab 1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9364280 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacopo Gennai (0000-0003-2662-2855, University of Cologne, corresponding author), Marcel Schemmel (0000-0002-0435-7651, University of Cologne), Jürgen Richter (0000-0003-2793-7867, University of Cologne) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2520-8217 • E-ISSN: 2520-8217 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s41982-022-00131-x |
| OpenAlex | W4313431778 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 55 |
The Ahmarian is the earliest fully fledged Upper Palaeolithic Levantine industry, and its hallmark is the el-Wad point, assumed to be a projectile implement. The Ahmarian is a blade-bladelet volumetric industry; however, bladelet production has frequently been portrayed as undifferentiated or secondary to blade production. El-Wad points are blades or bladelets with a fine to steep lateral retouch, often further shaping the tip. The role of bladelets and blades, both in the retouched and unretouched assemblages, is highly debated in order to refine Early Upper Palaeolithic (EUP) taxonomical and technological issues. Here, we use data coming from our excavations at the southern Ahmarian site of Al-Ansab 1 to reconsider the role of bladelets and el-Wad points in the assemblage. We show that bladelet production was key, and blades were mostly used to shape the convexities to produce convergent bladelets. El-Wad point blanks mostly stemmed from an early stage of the reduction sequence, being conventionally classified as small blades or big bladelets. Modification of these blanks likely improved their suboptimal shape, while smaller bladelets were not modified. Our detailed review of the existing literature produced corresponding evidence regarding lithic technology, while the exact function of el-Wad points is still pending on complementary use-wear analyses. With our new data, we expect to provoke a reconsideration of the Ahmarian technological system. As bladelets attract more and more attention in EUP research, we propose that the southern Ahmarian had already fully completed the technological and cultural shift to the preferred use of small projectile inserts
Archaeology · Assemblage (archaeology · Blade (archaeology · Geography · Lithic technology · Projectile point · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology
A Microarchaeological Study of Combustion Features and Site Formation Processes at Shualim Rockshelter, an Upper Paleolithic Site, Central Negev Highlands, Israel
An Increase in Small Flake Sharp-edge Productivity Across the Initial–Early Upper Paleolithic at Tolbor (Mongolia)
Dawn of the Initial and Early Upper Paleolithic blade industries in the Levant
Ex Oriente Lux? A quantitative comparison between northern Ahmarian and Protoaurignacian
The modern human colonization of western Eurasia
Visualizations with statistical details
New chronology for Ksâr ‘Akil (Lebanon) supports Levantine route of modern human dispersal into Europe
Radiocarbon chronology of Manot Cave, Israel and Upper Paleolithic dispersals
Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev Israel
More than Meets the Eye
Neandertal-Modern Human Contact in Western Eurasia
The Ahmarian in the Context of the Earlier Upper Palaeolithic in the Near East
Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East
Ksar Akil, Lebanon
Lithics
Subsistence and Technology in The Late Levantine Upper Paleolithic
Sealed in Stone
Notes sur le Paléolithique Supérieur du Moyen Orient
Multiple environmental change at the time of the Modern Human passage through the Middle East
New radiocarbon dating of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in Kebara Cave, Israel
Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact
Intra-Site Structure of the Early Ahmarian Site of Al-Ansab 1, AH 1 (Jordan)
Gazelle Hunting Strategies in the Early Ahmarian
La grotte Mandrin et les premières occupations du Paléolithique supérieur en Occitanie orientale
An Early Upper Palaeolithic Stone Tool Assemblage from Mughr El-Hamamah, Jordan
Frequency and production technology of bladelets in Late Middle Paleolithic, Initial Upper Paleolithic, and Early Upper Paleolithic (Ahmarian) assemblages in Jebel Qalkha, Southern Jordan
Early Upper Paleolithic Sites in the Qadesh Barnea Area, NE Sinai
Weapons in transition
Identification par l’expérimentation de la percussion au percuteur de calcaire au Paléolithique moyen
Living on the edge – A comparative approach for studying the beginning of the Aurignacian
Their lips are sealed
Protoaurignacian Core Reduction Procedures
Composite projectiles and hafting technologies at Ohalo II (23 ka, Israel)
Can Lithic Attribute Analyses Identify Discrete Reduction Trajectories? A Quantitative Study Using Refitted Lithic Sets
The African Origin of Complex Projectile Technology
The origins of lithic projectile point technology
A Unified Lithic Taxonomy Based on Patterns of Core Reduction
Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates
Radiocarbon Dating in the Southern Levant
The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP)
Identité technique et comportements économiques des groupes proto-aurignaciens à la grotte de l’Observatoire (principauté de Monaco)
Within Projectile Range
Variability in Early Ahmarian lithic technology and its implications for the model of a Levantine origin of the Protoaurignacian
The Upper Paleolithic period in the Levant
Ksar Akil and the Upper Palaeolithic of the Levant
The Upper Paleolithic of the Wadi Feiran, Southern Sinai
Fifty years after
Why Microliths? Microlithization in the Levant
The early Upper Paleolithic occupations at Üçağızlı Cave (Hatay, Turkey)
La chaîne opératoire a 70 ans
A technotypological analysis of the Ahmarian and Levantine Aurignacian assemblages from Manot Cave (area C) and the interrelation with site formation processes
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |