Is “Region” Still Good to Think
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9401487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mrinalini Sinha (University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 264-267 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1089-201X • E-ISSN: 1548-226X |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/1089201x-2378049 |
| OpenAlex | W2050874103 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 12 |
This essay responds to the mission statement of Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East and considers the place of region in the contemporary postnational and post-area studies moment of scholarship. In particular, it examines the possibilities of leveraging further the opening that the journal created between area studies scholarship and the traditional academic disciplines
Middle East · Moment (physics · Political science · Regional science · Scholarship · Sociology · Statement (logic · Asian Studies and History · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |