Algorithmic credit allocation and the rise of financial inequality
Evidence from U.S. fintech platforms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9403933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Touitou Mohammed (0000-0002-4442-7888, University of Algiers 3, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 599-629 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-14 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Oeconomica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6373 • E-ISSN: 1588-2659 |
| Publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó (PUBLISHER • HU) |
| DOI | 10.1556/032.2025.00134 |
| OpenAlex | W4416415513 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Algorithmic credit systems used by fintech platforms are increasingly transforming access to financial services across the United States. While machine learning–driven models improve credit availability, they also raise concerns about fairness, transparency, and structural bias. This study presents a hybrid empirical framework—combining causal inference techniques with explainable AI audits—to evaluate the distributional impacts of fintech lending from 2010 to 2023 at the ZIP-code level. Using difference-in-differences estimations and Causal Forest models, we find that fintech entry increases approval rates by 6–9 percentage points, particularly in low-income and majority-minority areas. However, these gains are accompanied by higher interest rates and spatially embedded proxy biases, especially in ZIP code–linked features. SHAP-based interpretability and fairness diagnostics reveal significant disparities and fairness decay under demographic drift. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Algorithmic Accountability Index (AAI) that quantifies disparities in transparency, proxy risk, and model equity. These findings provide policy-relevant insights for digital financial governance, algorithmic audit standards, and the equitable design of AI-based credit infrastructures
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems
Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks
Big Data's Disparate Impact
Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination
Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability
The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions
Machine Learning
| Highly cited | No |
|---|