Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Algorithmic credit allocation and the rise of financial inequality

Evidence from U.S. fintech platforms

Bibliographic Data

ID9403933
AuthorsTouitou Mohammed (0000-0002-4442-7888, University of Algiers 3, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume75
Issue4
Pages599-629
Publication date2025-11-14
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Oeconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6373 • E-ISSN: 1588-2659
PublisherAkadémiai Kiadó (PUBLISHER • HU)
DOI10.1556/032.2025.00134
OpenAlexW4416415513
LanguageEN
References cited38

Algorithmic credit systems used by fintech platforms are increasingly transforming access to financial services across the United States. While machine learning–driven models improve credit availability, they also raise concerns about fairness, transparency, and structural bias. This study presents a hybrid empirical framework—combining causal inference techniques with explainable AI audits—to evaluate the distributional impacts of fintech lending from 2010 to 2023 at the ZIP-code level. Using difference-in-differences estimations and Causal Forest models, we find that fintech entry increases approval rates by 6–9 percentage points, particularly in low-income and majority-minority areas. However, these gains are accompanied by higher interest rates and spatially embedded proxy biases, especially in ZIP code–linked features. SHAP-based interpretability and fairness diagnostics reveal significant disparities and fairness decay under demographic drift. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Algorithmic Accountability Index (AAI) that quantifies disparities in transparency, proxy risk, and model equity. These findings provide policy-relevant insights for digital financial governance, algorithmic audit standards, and the equitable design of AI-based credit infrastructures

  • Model Cards for Model Reporting

    Open Access•Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu et al.•Proceedings of the Conference on…•2019

  • Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems

    Open Access•Andrew D Selbst, Drick Boyd et al.•Proceedings of the Conference on…•2019

  • Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks

    Open Access•Greg Buchak, Gregor Matvos et al.•Journal of Financial Economics•2018

  • Big Data's Disparate Impact

    Open Access•Solon Barocas, Andrew D Selbst•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring

    Open Access•Manish Raghavan, Solon Barocas et al.•Proceedings of the 2020…•2020

  • Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

    Stefan Wager, Susan Athey•Journal of the American…•2018

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

    Open Access•Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez et al.•Information Fusion•2020

  • Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination

    Joseph G Altonji, Charles R Pierret•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators

    Alberto Abadie•The Review of Economic Studies•2005

  • Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations

    Open Access•Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers et al.•Science•2019

  • Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods

    Open Access•Brantly Callaway, Pedro H C Sant’Anna•Journal of Econometrics•2021

  • Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability

    Emily Oster•Journal of Business and Economic…•2019

  • The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions

    Open Access•Tal Zarsky•Science Technology & Human Values•2016

  • Machine Learning

    Open Access•Sendhil Mullainathan, Jann Spie et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae