Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter M. Jones. Agricultural Enlightenment

Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750–1840

Bibliographic Data

ID9420114
AuthorsNathaniel Wolloch (0000-0002-9758-7834, Tel Aviv University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume123
Issue1
Pages296-297
Publication date2018-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-8762 • E-ISSN: 1937-5239
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ahr/123.1.296
OpenAlexW2789384135
LanguageEN

In Agricultural Enlightenment: Knowledge, Technology, and Nature, 1750–1840, Peter M. Jones investigates the Enlightenment roots of the agricultural revolution—how the eighteenth-century accumulation of agricultural knowledge enabled subsequent technological progress in agricultural practices. Jones makes a consistent point that the Agricultural Enlightenment was pan-European. He claims that it was the pluralization of the interpretation of the Enlightenment(s) in the 1980s that enabled investigations of this sort. Ironically, however, Jones’s discussion validates the view of the Enlightenment as a unified phenomenon, one of the manifestations of which was to impel progress in agricultural knowledge and production, just as progress in other fields, political, social, and technological, was induced. Yet however one interprets this point, this is an interesting, original, and timely book. Jones notes the difficulties in gathering precise information on agricultural production in the eighteenth century, but nonetheless pieces together an inquiry that vindicates the notion of an Agricultural Enlightenment propelled by a “knowledge economy” (9), institutional developments, and technological capabilities. The Enlightenment idea of mastery of nature was coupled with a view of agricultural progress as a patriotic duty of the elite. Yet this progress also spread further, and “how to” knowledge propagated in agricultural treatises and manuals became another avenue of development. Despite the difficulty involved in determining how exactly this knowledge impacted practice, Jones painstakingly manages to show that this indeed happened. He depicts this development up to the mid-nineteenth century, at which point the age of informal knowledge ended and was replaced by institutionalized natural sciences

Agriculture · Archaeology · Art history · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Philosophy · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae