Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutional Law in 1959–1960

Bibliographic Data

ID9427348
AuthorsDavid Fellman (corresponding author)
Year1961
Volume55
Issue1
Pages112-135
Publication date1961-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1976054
OpenAlexW4249798717
LanguageEN
References cited36

The personnel of the Supreme Court remained unchanged during the 1959 Term. From the point of view of the decisions rendered in the public law field, this was an undistinguished Term. Few of the constitutional cases are likely to hold an important place among the precedents, and a considerable number of well-argued decisions turned entirely upon private law questions. But there was no dearth of writing, during the period under review, about the Court as an institution and about the Justices who sit there. Note may be made at this point of the latest chapter in the long dispute over the so-called tidelands. In 1947 the Supreme Court had ruled that, as against the claims of California, the United States possessed paramount rights in lands underlying the Pacific Ocean seaward from the low-water mark. Similar rulings were made in 1950 as regards the claims of Louisiana and Texas in the Gulf of Mexico. But with the enactment in 1953 of the Submerged Lands Act, the United States relinquished to the coastal states all of its rights in all lands beneath navigable waters within the three-mile limit, and in excess of that limit within state boundaries as they existed at the time a state became a member of the Union, or as theretofore approved by Congress. The limit of the grant was three leagues (about ten and one-half miles) in the Gulf of Mexico and three geographical miles in the Atlantic and Pacific. The actual extent of the claims of the coastal states involved in the question was therefore left to be settled by litigation

League · Political science · State (computer science · Supreme court · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

  • Felix Frankfurter

    Open Access•Helen Thomas, Helen Shirley Thomas•Felix Frankfurter•2019

  • Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process

    Joseph Goldstein•The Yale Law Journal•1960

  • Dime Store Demonstrations

    Open Access•Daniel H Pollitt•Duke Law Journal•1960

  • The Supreme Court of the United States

    Dorothy Campbell Topkins•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1960

  • The Federalist

    John P Roche, Gottfried Dietze•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1961

  • Our Common Law Constitution

    S Sidney Ulmer, J A C Grant•The Western Political Quarterly•1961

  • Legacy of Suppression

    Robert E Brown, Robert Brown et al.•The Journal of Southern History•1961

  • Supreme Court Attitudes Toward Federal Administrative Agencies

    Joseph Tanenhaus•The Journal of Politics•1960

  • The British Security Program, 1948-1958

    Open Access•Werner F Grunbaum•The Western Political Quarterly•1960

  • Supreme Court Behavior and Civil Rights

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•The Western Political Quarterly•1960

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae