Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Capital Programming in Philadelphia

A Study of Long-Range Planning

Bibliographic Data

ID9434671
AuthorsWilliam Hill Brown, Charles E Gilbert (Swarthmore College, corresponding author)
Year1960
Volume54
Issue3
Pages659-668
Publication date1960-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1953944
OpenAlexW4244918998
LanguageEN
References cited9

This paper results from a larger study of capital budgeting and programming in Philadelphia. Our intention here is to present some findings bearing upon the role of long-range planning primarily, though not exclusively, in metropolitan governments. Much, though surely not all, of city planning today is directly related to capital programming. This is especially so in large cities for at least three major reasons: basic physical plant and utilities are often run down or obsolescent for a complex of historical reasons; many routine programs are “capital-intensive” and are becoming more so under the impact of new technology and professional standards; and urban renewal has entailed an increasingly entrepreneurial approach to land-use planning. Capital programming itself is a process of separate budgetary decision on capital items, however defined. The rationale for the separate decision process values “planning” highly and emphasizes fiscal planning of outlay that is loan-financed and physical planning of projects distinguished by “lumpiness” and/or longevity. It follows from these considerations that the planning and programming of physical improvements cannot be sharply separated from the remainder of municipal policy. City planning as applied to capital programming has to do not only with land use but with most functional programs and with fiscal policy. While some long-range municipal planning will probably take place in the line departments, the focal point of planning is likely to be the review and assembly of the overall capital program, at which point fiscal, programmatic and land-use planning all come into play even if the principal competence and concern of the planning agency is in land-use planning. The planning agency can be conceived as performing any or all of the four roles of research, integration, allocation , and provision of the long view. While conceptually distinguishable, these roles tend to merge in the practice of capital program review

Business · Capital (architecture · Capital budgeting · Economic planning · Economics · Environmental design and planning · Geography · Land use · Land-use planning · Loan · Market economy · Metropolitan area · Point (geometry · Regional planning · Urban planning · Engineering · Finance · Housing Market and Economics

  • Politics, planning, and the public interest

    Martin Meyerson•Politics, planning, and the…•1964

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Planning Function in Urban Government

    Dorothy I Cline, Robert Averill Walker•The Western Political Quarterly•1952

  • Implementing the General Interest

    Rexford G Tugwell•Public Administration Review•1940

  • Toward a Theory of Budgeting

    Verne B Lewis•Public Administration Review•1952

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae