Constitutional Law in 1920–1921. I
The Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the October Term, 1920
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9434703 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward S Corwin (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1922 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 22-40 |
| Publication date | 1922-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1943885 |
| OpenAlex | W2916125761 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
The work of the court last term is chiefly notable for its amplification of certain important results of the preceding term. Thus, the final objection to the validity of the Eighteenth Amendment was refuted; the last great question touching the meaning of the word “income” in the Sixteenth Amendment was answered; the emergency powers of government in war time were brought into contact with more usual sources of public authority—this in the rent law cases; and some minor phases of the problem of freedom of speech and press were disposed of. However, in two cases, both of much interest to the political scientist, somewhat novel questions of national power were raised; and in neither was a certainly final solution offered. Questions of state power were again of decidedly subordinate significance and interest
Constitutional law · Government (linguistics · Meaning (existential · Original meaning · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · State (computer science · Supreme court · Term (time · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,03 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 1987 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |