The British Dominions and Neutrality

Under the ordinary circumstances of peaceful relations with other states, the peculiar position of the Dominions in the British Commonwealth of Nations may be of little importance. Except to those insistent on the point of national pride, it makes little difference whether foreign Powers have or have not recognized the independent and sovereign character of the Dominions so long as they understand that the responsible governments with which they are dealing are the several ministries in the Dominions. Both external and internal autonomy has undoubtedly been attained by the Dominions in all normal peace-time affairs, and this situation has been recognized by other states. It matters little whether other states take seriously the symbolism of the Crown and the unity of the kingship or whether they regard these as among the odd aberrations of British illogicality. In war-time, however, a very different position is presented when one considers the status of the individual members of the Commonwealth. The sovereign rights of war and neutrality are not necessarily two aspects of the same power. The war power is capable of unilateral exercise; a state of war is brought into existence by the action of one state, and the legal consequences of belligerency follow automatically and indeed may be claimed by political associations or communities which are not recognized as sovereign states

Autonomy · Commonwealth · Economics · Monarchy · Neutrality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereign state · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Law

• Greenland (1940) as an Instance of Pickwickian ‘Cooperation’ Between King’s Ottawa and Roosevelt’s Washington

  Open Access•David G Haglund•London Journal of Canadian Studies•2022

  Add to list

• “Plain Grand Imperialism on a Miniature Scale”

  David G Haglund•The American Review of Canadian…•1981

  Add to list