Public Opinion and the Intellectuals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9438003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francis G Wilson (University of Illinois System, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1954 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 321-339 |
| Publication date | 1954-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1951199 |
| OpenAlex | W2172231837 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 10 |
A study of the relation of intellectuals to public opinion suggests the outlines of a sociology of the intellectuals as a functioning social group. The libertas philosophandi has long been asserted by the educated elite, and in pre-democratic days the theoretical relation to public opinion was quite clear. Philosophers have had the civil liberty to criticize government, but the same right was not generously extended to the vulgar conscience, or the common men who composed the “open public.” Actually, the rise of democracy has not really clarified the issue, though the mass or Gnostic movements of modern times have asserted the right to judge the government, the intellectuals, and any other group that might stand in the way of political victory. The democratic intellectual can hardly say that the revolting mass does not have the right to judge him, but he can and does say that public opinion must be reformed, purified, educated, or directed by the latest in scientific hypothesis. More especially, however, the modern selfconscious intellectuals have directed their fire against other groups or elites who have a following and who in fact provide a pluralistic leadership of public opinion
Civil society · Conscience · Democracy · Elite · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Relation (database · Sociology · Victory · Law · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |