Policy-Making and Secretariat Influence in the U. N. General Assembly
The Case of Public Information
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9438722 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leon Gordenker (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1960 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 359-373 |
| Publication date | 1960-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1978299 |
| OpenAlex | W2166671778 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
During the annual sessions of the General Assembly of the United Nations the policy and budget of the Office of Public Information (OPI) of the organization have been the perennial center of a complex debate. Instructions first given the Secretariat in 1946 provide some elements of this debate, while others depend on the professional expertise of the international civil service and on its influence and support in a General Assembly divided several ways. As a whole, the outcome demonstrates once more both the durable force of an attractive idea and the truth of the maxim that secretariats have great weight in the policy processes of international, as of other, organizations. For despite repeated debate and attack OPI has proved enduring and resilient. During the last 15 years the many-faceted program of the agency has shrunk somewhat, to be sure, under the economizer's knife. In particular, it was under unusually severe criticism in 1957, when the General Assembly established an expert committee to investigate UN public information activities, and also in 1958, when the results of the inquiry were discussed. This committee, appointed with the unenthusiastic concurrence of the Secretary General, and made up of six governmental nominees not all of whom had experience with public information, directly challenged some of the working assumptions of OPI and called attention to difficulties with others. Their report struck a blow, too, at the internal balance of OPI, accused it of substantive failures and urged it to design new programs
Agency (philosophy · Criticism · General assembly · Political science · Public relations · Public service · Social science · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
| Citation span | 1963 - 2023 (61) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |