The Japanese Mandate Naval Base Question
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9439209 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luther H Evans (0009-0006-5070-4542, Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1935 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 482-487 |
| Publication date | 1935-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1947766 |
| OpenAlex | W2282379412 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Public opinion in support of the efficacy of collective efforts for the preservation of peace has been considerably weakened by the events of the past three or four years. While it is exceedingly doubtful whether much success will attend whatever other courses of action nations may adopt to secure themselves against the world's turmoil, students of international affairs must accept the fact that we are now in an eddy of the current of progress. But there is slight justification for despair. Indeed, much has come through the wreckage of the sanctions failure almost undamaged. In certain large fields of action, there has been success in the attempts of the League and allied institutions to create a better world of international relations. Among other successes, the mandates system stands unchallenged as a large advance in the supervision of colonial administration
Action (physics · Administration (probate law · Collective action · Foreign policy · International relations · Law and economics · League · Mandate · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sanctions · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|