Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Analysis of Administrative Purpose

Bibliographic Data

ID9447236
AuthorsJames K Feely (Syracuse University, corresponding author)
Year1951
Volume45
Issue4
Pages1069-1080
Publication date1951-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1951248
OpenAlexW2328096106
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited2

The battleground of administrative theory has witnessed the rise of functional-institutionalism, under the banners of Gulick and others, and the yielding, in part, of its “principles” to the hordes of the iconoclastic “pragmatic revolt” (or the cult of “administrationism” as Waldo labeled it). But just as legal realism has been interpreted by some observers as law's acid bath, so, too, this new “administrative realism” is considered by many a catharsis, not a cure. Some present-day theorists have attempted to throw normative life-lines to the administrator. Appleby has written of the socio-political role of the administrative process. Barnard and Friedrich have called upon the administrator to act under the rubric of his moral responsibility. Others on the organizational level—Stene for example—have attempted to derive a “pure theory of organization,” not based upon all-embracing, clearly predictive rules, but rather in the form of theories of “administrative statics” (another Waldoism) which may be cast over a framework of the concrete purposes of any specific administrative situation. The underlying continuum supporting both the social norms of Appleby, Barnard and Friedrich, and the organizational theoretics of Stene, is purpose . Indeed, defined purpose alone could make sensible Stene's axiom that “The degree to which any given organization approaches the full realization of its objectives tends to vary directly with the coordination of individual effort.” If the objectives are discoverable only by hindsight, a query may well be raised: Does coordination exist because the purpose was realized, or is the purpose realized because coordination existed? Clearly, a well-grounded theory of public administration must be based on a predictively refined approach to the concept of purpose

Axiom · Epistemology · Hindsight bias · Law and economics · Normative · Political science · Realism · Sociology · Accounting and Organizational Management · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology

  • Administrative Action and Administrative Behaviour

    Open Access•Turo Virtanen•The Palgrave Handbook of Public…•2018

  • Beyond Woodrow Wilson

    Open Access•Mark R Rutgers•Administration & Society•1997

  • Language, truth and logic

    A J Ayer•Language, truth and logic•1990

  • An Approach to a Science of Administration

    Open Access•Edwin O Stene•American Political Science Review•1940

Citations per year0.07
Citation span1997 - 2018 (22)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae