Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9467608 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H E Maes (University of Kent, corresponding author), H Maes |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 121-138 |
| Publication date | 2010-02-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/aesthj/ayp051 |
| OpenAlex | W2024734911 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The role of the artist’s intention in the interpretation of art has been the topic of a lively and ongoing discussion in analytic aesthetics. First, I sketch the current state of this debate, focussing especially on two competing views: actual and hypothetical intentionalism. Secondly, I discuss the search for a suitable test case, i.e. a work of art that is interpreted differently by actual and hypothetical intentionalists, with only one of these interpretations being plausible. Many works from many different art forms have been considered in this respect, but none of these test cases has proved convincing. Thirdly, I introduce two new test cases taken from contemporary visual art. I explain why these examples are better suited as test cases and how they lend support to the actual intentionalist position
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Contemporary art · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Performance art · Visual arts · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Artistic and Creative Research · Philosophy · Visual Culture and Art Theory
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |