The Individual ‘We’ Narrator

The prevailing assumption in literary studies tends to be that a ‘we’ narrative voice is either that of an individual purporting to speak for a group, or that of a collective of people whose perspectives have coalesced into a unified one. Recent work on social agency across the cognitive humanities suggests another way of understanding what might be conveyed by such a ‘we’. Social cognition research shows that individuals can have their capacities changed and enhanced when they interact with others, and suggests that ‘we-representations’ in the individual mind may result from the transformative effects of interaction. In this paper, we draw on a specific instance of storytelling in the plural, William Faulkner’s ‘A Rose for Emily’, to articulate a theory of this ‘individual we’, and to show its potential in refining our understanding of ‘we’ narratives. We also propose that in future research the interdisciplinary study of the ‘we’ could engage with insights from literature as well as from philosophy and science

Agency (philosophy · Cognition · Cognitive science · Developmental psychology · Epistemology · Linguistics · Narrative · Narratology · Plural · Sociology · Storytelling · Transformative learning · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Media Influence and Health · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Narrer au nous

  Arthur Brügger•Poétique•2022

  Add to list