Christopher M. Rein. The North African Air Campaign
U.S. Army Air Forces from El Alamein to Salerno
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9492582 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wray R Johnson (United States Marine Corps, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 119 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 922-922 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-8762 • E-ISSN: 1937-5239 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ahr/119.3.922 |
| OpenAlex | W2331321424 |
| Language | EN |
In The North African Air Campaign, Christopher M. Rein provides a useful explanation of the import of the Allied air effort in North Africa during World War II. North Africa exposed the rift between ground-minded commanders and air-minded commanders regarding how airpower should be employed in war. Ground commanders have generally considered the airplane to be an evolutionary extension of war, and airplanes simply another weapon in the inventory, one most properly used to support the main effort (defined as the land campaign). Airmen, however, have argued that airpower is revolutionary and more than simply flying artillery or the eyes of ground commanders. They believe that airpower is a war-winning capability in its own right and should be largely (if not completely) free of surface tethers. They also believe that the best way to advance the ground effort is to wrest control of the air away from the enemy. Yet at the beginning of World War II, the ground-centric perspective held sway. North Africa would change this.
Adversary · Aeronautics · Ancient history · Archaeology · Artillery · Battlefield · First world war · Operations research · Political science · Spanish Civil War · World War II · Engineering · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|