Comparative Law and Legal Translation

Why the Terms Cassation, Revision and Appeal Should Not Be Translated

Bibliographic Data

ID9533119
AuthorsSofie M F Geeroms, Sofie Geeroms (Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume50
Issue1
Pages201
Publication date2002-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/840834
OpenAlexW2002985460
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Journal Article Comparative Law and Legal Translation: Why the Terms Cassation, Revision and Appeal Should Not Be Translated ... Get access Sofie M.F. Geeroms Sofie M.F. Geeroms 1Sofie M.F. Geeroms, Lie. Rechten K.U.Leuven 1994, D.E.A. Paris II (Panthéon-Assas) 1995, LL.M. Harvard Law School 1999, Dr. Rechten KU.Leuven 2002. Staff legal adviser at the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Lausanne (Switzerland). The following article is an elaborated extract of her Harvard LL.M. paper written under the supervision of Professor Arthur T. von Mehren, for which she was awarded the Addison Brown Prize. She owes much gratitude to Professor von Mehren for his suggestions and advice on a preliminary draft of this article. The author also wishes to thank her previous K.U.L.-colleague Melaku Geboye Desta for his useful comments on the final version. The same applies to Nidhi Gupta, David Haljan and Karen Jeanneret-Druckman. Full responsibility for the content of this article, however, is to be borne by the author alone Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 50, Issue 1, Winter 2002, Pages 201–228, https://doi.org/10.2307/840834 Published: 01 January 2002

Appeal · Gratitude · Political science · Sociology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · European and International Contract Law · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub