The UK’s referendum on EU membership of June 2016
How expectations of Brexit’s impact affected the outcome
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9537162 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen D Fisher (0000-0002-1006-1638, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Alan Renwick (0000-0002-4344-2082, The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 590-611 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Politica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6810 • E-ISSN: 1741-1416 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41269-018-0111-3 |
| OpenAlex | W2887836871 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 20 |
The UK voted by a narrow margin to leave the European Union in a referendum on 23 June 2016. This article examines why this was the result and brings out comparative implications. Building on previous findings that expectations about the impact of Brexit were central to voters’ decisions, we seek to improve understanding of how these expectations mattered. On average across a range of issues, our analysis suggests that Leave would have won if voters had expected things to stay much the same following Brexit. A big exception is immigration, for which “no change” is associated with Remain voting. But there was a clear expectation that immigration would fall after Brexit (as most voters wanted). That consideration strengthened the Leave vote, and did so sufficiently to overwhelm a more important but less widely and strongly held expectation that the economy would suffer. We also find that those who were uncertain about where Brexit might lead were more likely to back the status quo. This supports a posited tendency towards status quo bias in referendum voting, notwithstanding a widespread belief that this bias failed to materialize in the Brexit vote. Our methods and findings have valuable implications for comparative research
Brexit · Comparative politics · Demographic economics · Economics · European union · Immigration · International economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Status quo · Status quo bias · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
The authoritarian dynamic and Brexit
Google, how should I vote? How users formulate search queries to find political information on search engines
Quitter la PAC, comment et pour quoi faire
Brexit behaviourally
Backlash politics against European integration
Breaking up is hard to do
Referendums in times of discontent
Policy Preferences and Policy Legitimacy After Referendums
A Populist Paradox? How Brexit Softened Anti-Immigrant Attitudes
Who gets persuaded? The heterogeneity of campaign effects in the Brexit referendum
The Politics of Direct Democracy
Brexit
Europe in Question
Affluence, Austerity and Electoral Change in Britain
Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis
Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit
Referendum outcomes and trust in government
Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French Rejected the European Constitution
Five Danish referendums on the European Community and European Union
The Brexit vote
A Nation Divided
Why Leave Won the UK's EU Referendum
Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ Effects in EU Referendums
Learning from the Danish case
The Danes and the Maastricht treaty
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |