Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The UK’s referendum on EU membership of June 2016

How expectations of Brexit’s impact affected the outcome

Bibliographic Data

ID9537162
AuthorsStephen D Fisher (0000-0002-1006-1638, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Alan Renwick (0000-0002-4344-2082, The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust)
Year2018
Volume53
Issue4
Pages590-611
Publication date2018-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Politica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6810 • E-ISSN: 1741-1416
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41269-018-0111-3
OpenAlexW2887836871
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited20

The UK voted by a narrow margin to leave the European Union in a referendum on 23 June 2016. This article examines why this was the result and brings out comparative implications. Building on previous findings that expectations about the impact of Brexit were central to voters’ decisions, we seek to improve understanding of how these expectations mattered. On average across a range of issues, our analysis suggests that Leave would have won if voters had expected things to stay much the same following Brexit. A big exception is immigration, for which “no change” is associated with Remain voting. But there was a clear expectation that immigration would fall after Brexit (as most voters wanted). That consideration strengthened the Leave vote, and did so sufficiently to overwhelm a more important but less widely and strongly held expectation that the economy would suffer. We also find that those who were uncertain about where Brexit might lead were more likely to back the status quo. This supports a posited tendency towards status quo bias in referendum voting, notwithstanding a widespread belief that this bias failed to materialize in the Brexit vote. Our methods and findings have valuable implications for comparative research

Brexit · Comparative politics · Demographic economics · Economics · European union · Immigration · International economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Status quo · Status quo bias · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

  • The authoritarian dynamic and Brexit

    Open Access•Daniel Stevens, Susan Banducci•European Journal of Social…•2023

  • Google, how should I vote? How users formulate search queries to find political information on search engines

    Open Access•Victoria Vziatysheva, Mykola Makhortykh et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Quitter la PAC, comment et pour quoi faire

    Viviane Gravey, Ludivine Petetin et al.•Politique européenne•2021

  • Brexit behaviourally

    Open Access•Tessa Buchanan•Mind & Society•2019

  • Backlash politics against European integration

    Open Access•Hanspeter Kriesi•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Breaking up is hard to do

    Open Access•Kevin B Grier, Kevin Grier et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Referendums in times of discontent

    Open Access•Kristof Jacobs•Acta Politica•2018

  • Policy Preferences and Policy Legitimacy After Referendums

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, James Tilley et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • A Populist Paradox? How Brexit Softened Anti-Immigrant Attitudes

    Open Access•Cassilde Schwartz, Miranda Simon et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Who gets persuaded? The heterogeneity of campaign effects in the Brexit referendum

    Open Access•D Snow•Electoral Studies•2022

  • The Politics of Direct Democracy

    Lawrence Leduc, Larry LeDuc•Politics of Direct Democracy•2003

  • Brexit

    Open Access•Harold D Clarke, Matthew Goodwin et al.•Brexit•2017

  • Europe in Question

    Sara B Hobolt•Europe in question•2009

  • Affluence, Austerity and Electoral Change in Britain

    Open Access•Paul Whiteley, Harold D Clarke et al.•Affluence, Austerity and…•2013

  • Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis

    Open Access•Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer et al.•Economic Policy•2017

  • Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit

    Open Access•Matthew Goodwin, Caitlin Milazzo•The British Journal of Politics…•2017

  • Referendum outcomes and trust in government

    Mark N Franklin, Cees Van Der Eijk et al.•West European Politics•1995

  • Contesting the European Union? Why the Dutch and the French Rejected the European Constitution

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, Sylvain Brouard•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Five Danish referendums on the European Community and European Union

    Open Access•Palle Svensson•European Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Brexit vote

    Sara B Hobolt•Journal of European Public Policy•2016

  • A Nation Divided

    Open Access•Richard Ford, Robert Ford et al.•Journal of democracy•2017

  • Why Leave Won the UK's EU Referendum

    Open Access•John Curtice•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2017

  • Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ Effects in EU Referendums

    Open Access•John Garry, Michael Marsh et al.•European Union Politics•2005

  • Learning from the Danish case

    Open Access•Mark N Franklin•European Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Danes and the Maastricht treaty

    Open Access•Karen Siune, Palle Svensson•Electoral Studies•1993

  • Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1994

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae