Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The partisan context of parliamentary questions

A study of opposition behavior in the danish parliament

Bibliographic Data

ID9537494
AuthorsRebecca Eissler (0000-0002-5832-7693, San Francisco State University), Christoffer Green-Pedersen (0000-0001-7153-9634, Aarhus University, corresponding author), Matt W Loftis (Aarhus University), Peter Bjerre Mortensen (0000-0001-5809-3260, Aarhus University), Annelise Russell (0000-0002-8417-1709, University of Kentucky)
Year2023
Volume58
Issue2
Pages359-378
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Politica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6810 • E-ISSN: 1741-1416
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41269-022-00248-5
OpenAlexW4283073338
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited32

This paper investigates MPs’ questions in Denmark. The paper focuses on the role of the “partisan context” for their questioning behavior. This refers to three aspects. First, the status of the party in terms of government versus opposition. Second, it refers to the issues a party finds important to focus on, as measured by its party manifesto. Third, it refers to the role of individual MPs within the party, most importantly the issues to which the MP is connected, measured by their committee membership. We investigate the role of the partisan context based on a unique database consisting of more than 35,000 questions to the minister asked by Danish MPs from 2004 to 2013. The paper highlights two findings. First, that the Danish model of minority governments with support parties creates a particular structure which shapes the partisan context and thus question behavior. Second, the importance of specialization within political parties. Being your parties’ representative in a given committee is thus central to understanding on which issues an MP asks questions, but especially if the issue is important for your party

Comparative politics · Context (archaeology · Danish · Linguistics · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Media and Politics

  • Walking the line

    Open Access•Jan Berz, Corinna Kroeber•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Grandstanding Instead of Deliberative Policy-Making

    Open Access•D Kostovicova, Lanabi La Lova•Journal of Intervention and…•2024

  • Parliamentary Oversight and the Effects of Controlled Institutional Settings on Behavioural Logics

    Open Access•Hallbera West•Government and Opposition•2026

  • Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls

    Helene Helboe Pedersen, Henrik B Seeberg•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Party competition on social media

    Open Access•Daniel Møller Eriksen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2024

  • Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models

    Harvey Goldstein, William Browne et al.•Understanding Statistics•2002

  • R-squared for Bayesian Regression Models

    Andrew Gelman, Ben Goodrich et al.•The American Statistician•2019

  • Gone Fishing

    Open Access•Shaun Bevan•Comparative Policy Agendas•2019

  • Variance Partitioning in Multilevel Logistic Models that Exhibit Overdispersion

    Open Access•William J Browne, V Subramanian et al.•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2005

  • Une Question Ecrite, Pour Quoi Faire?’ The Causes of the Production of Written Questions in the French Assemblée Nationale

    Open Access•Sebastien G Lazardeux, Sébastien Lazardeux•French Politics•2005

  • Electoral Vulnerability, Constituency Focus, and Parliamentary Questions in the House of Commons

    Open Access•Michael Kellermann•The British Journal of Politics…•2015

  • National policy for local reasons

    Open Access•Thomas Däubler•Acta Politica•2020

  • Who Cares About the EU? French MPs and the Europeanisation of Parliamentary Questions

    Julien Navarro, Sylvain Brouard•Journal of Legislative Studies•2014

  • Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments

    Federico Russo, Matti Wiberg•Journal of Legislative Studies•2010

  • Personalised parliamentary behaviour without electoral incentives

    Tom Louwerse, Simon Otje•West European Politics•2016

  • Parliamentary questions as a control mechanism in coalition governments

    Daniel Höhmann, Ulrich Sieberer•West European Politics•2020

  • The French National Assembly's Oversight of the Executive

    Sebastien G Lazardeux•West European Politics•2009

  • Parliamentary questions as strategic party tools

    Open Access•Simon Otje, Tom Louwerse•West European Politics•2018

  • Win Some, Lose None? Support Parties at the Polls and in Political Agenda-Setting

    Open Access•Gunnar Thesen•Political Studies•2016

  • Bringing Parties Into Parliament

    Open Access•Christoffer Green-Pedersen•Party Politics•2010

  • From agenda setters to agenda takers? The determinants of party issue attention in times of crisis

    Open Access•Enrico Borghetto, Federico Russo•Party Politics•2018

  • Committee Assignments

    Open Access•Shane Martins, Tim A Mickler•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • Geographic Representation in Party‐Dominated Legislatures

    Open Access•Thomas Zittel, Dominic Nyhuis et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Bloc Politics vs. Broad Cooperation? the functioning of Danish minority parliamentarism

    Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Lisbeth Hoffmann Thomsen•Journal of Legislative Studies•2005

  • Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures

    Shane Martins•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • The Constituency as a Focus of Representation

    Federico Russo•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the opportunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies

    Julian Garritzmann, Julian L Garritzmann•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • The Impact of Parliamentary Specialisation on Cosponsorship

    Tom Louwerse, Simon Otje•Journal of Legislative Studies•2015

  • Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament

    Asbjørn Skjæveland•Journal of Legislative Studies•2001

  • How preferences, information and institutions interactively drive agenda‐setting

    Open Access•R Vliegenthart, Stefaan Walgrave et al.•European Journal of Political…•2013

  • Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda‐setting

    Open Access•Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Christoffer Green‐pedersen et al.•European Journal of Political…•2010

  • Content Matters

    Open Access•R Vliegenthart, Stefaan Walgrave•Comparative Political Studies•2011

  • Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study

    John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Parliamentary Questions as an Instrument for Geographic Representation

    Open Access•Enrico Borghetto, José Santana-Pereira et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2020

  • Incentives to cultivate a personal vote

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Matthew Soberg Shugart•Electoral Studies•1995

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae