Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The epistemic quality of expert bodies

From normative-theoretical concept to empirical measurement

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9537644
AutoresCathrine Holst (0000-0002-2231-5826, University of Oslo, autor correspondente), Johan Christensen (0000-0002-2582-7827, Leiden University)
Ano2024
Volume59
Fascículo4
Páginas822-846
Data de publicação2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoActa Politica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0001-6810 • E-ISSN: 1741-1416
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41269-023-00312-8
OpenAlexW4386100141
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas54

The ubiquity of experts in contemporary policy-making has been met with enthusiasm in some quarters, but has also faced severe criticism. Beyond the democratic concerns regarding expert power, critics have raised worries about whether experts actually contribute to increasing the epistemic quality of policies, in line with normative expectations. Yet, so far, limited attention has been paid to the specific conditions under which experts involved in policy-making are likely to live up to such expectations. The article outlines a set of such conditions and empirically examines their fulfillment in the case of a real-world expert body. The article contributes theoretically to normative political theory about the proper role of expertise in policy-making; methodologically by linking normative theorizing and empirical analysis; and empirically through a longitudinal analysis based on large-n data of the extent to which the expert body under scrutiny satisfies a set of quantifiable empirical indicators of the proposed conditions

Comparative politics · Criticism · Economics · Empirical research · Enthusiasm · Epistemology · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Quality (philosophy · Scrutiny · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Trends in the Informational Basis of Policymaking

    Open Access•Erik Døving, Jostein Askim et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2026

  • Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander et al.•Expertise, Policy-Making and…•2022

  • Institutionalized Policy Evaluation within the Democratic System

    Open Access•Chiara Fumagalli•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • Legitimizing sustainability transitions through stakeholder participation

    Open Access•Jörg Radtke, David Löw Beer•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Philosophy, Policy, and Moral Expertise

    Open Access•Jakob Elster, Cathrine Holst•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2024

  • Gender Representation in Expert Advisory Bodies

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Johan Christensen et al.•Politics & Gender•2025

  • Democracy without Shortcuts

    Cristina Lafont•Democracy Without Shortcuts•2019

  • Securities against Misrule

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Securities Against Misrule•2013

  • Democracy Disfigured

    Nadia Urbinati•Democracy Disfigured•2014

  • Rethinking Expertise

    Harry Collins, Robert Evans•Rethinking Expertise•2007

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • Democracy and Expertise

    Frank Fischer•Democracy and expertise•2009

  • Science in Democracy

    Michael B Brown, Mark B Brown•Science in democracy•2009

  • Advisory commissions, academic expertise and democratic legitimacy

    Johan Christensen, Cathrine Holst•Science and Public Policy•2017

  • Public Accountability

    Mark Bovens, Robert E Goodin et al.•2014

  • Rational deliberation among experts and citizens

    Open Access•Thomas Christiano•Deliberative Systems•2012

  • Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy

    Sherrie Chamber, Simone Chambers•Social Epistemology•2017

  • The National Origins of Policy Ideas

    Open Access•John L Campbell, Ove K Pedersen•The National Origins Of Policy…•2014

  • Against Democracy

    Jason Brennan•Against Democracy•2016

  • The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology

    Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabó Gendler et al.•Oxford Handbook of Philosophical…•2016

  • Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden

    David Wightman, Hugh Heclo•The American Historical Review•1975

  • Why Trust Science

    Open Access•Naomi Oreskes, Jon Krosnick et al.•Why Trust Science?•2019

  • Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander et al.•Expertise, Policy-Making and…•2022

  • The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology

    Jules Holroyd, Katherine Puddifoot et al.•Routledge Handbook of Social…•2019

  • Expertise and Participation

    Open Access•Eva Krick•Expertise and Participation•2021

  • Critical Elitism

    Open Access•Alfred Moore•Critical Elitism•2017

  • The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy

    Annabelle Lever, Andrei Poama•Routledge Handbook of Ethics and…•2018

  • The Honest Broker

    Open Access•Roger A Pielke, Jr Roger A Pielke•Honest Broker•2007

  • Bounded deliberation in public committees

    Silje Maria Tellmann•Critical Policy Studies•2016

  • Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory

    Open Access•Laura Valentini•Philosophy Compass•2012

  • How does the European Commission use scientific expertise? Results from a survey of scientific members of the Commission’s expert committees

    Open Access•Dovilė Rimkutė, Markus Haverland•Comparative European Politics•2014

  • Worries About Philosopher Experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

  • How Do Advocacy Think Tanks Relate to Academic Knowledge? The Case of Norway

    Open Access•Johan Christensen, Cathrine Holst•Scandinavian Political Studies•2020

  • Scientists as experts

    Open Access•Torbjørn Gundersen•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Values in Science

    Open Access•Kristina H Rolin, Kristina Rolin•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Economic knowledge and the scientization of policy advice

    Open Access•Johan Christensen•Policy Sciences•2018

  • The political functions of expert knowledge

    Christina Boswell•Journal of European Public Policy•2008

  • Access of Experts

    Åse Gornitzka, Ulf Sverdrup•West European Politics•2011

  • Partisanship and science advice

    Open Access•Stine Hesstvedt•Party Politics•2023

  • The Limits of Transparency

    Open Access•Eugénia C Heldt, Lisa M Herzog•Government and Opposition•2022

  • Political and administrative control of expert groups—A mixed‐methods study

    Open Access•Stine Hesstvedt, Johan Christensen•Governance•2023

  • Epistemic democracy and the role of experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander•Contemporary Political Theory•2019

  • Measurement Validity

    Open Access•Robert Adcock, Donald Collier et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization

    Open Access•Nathan Caplan•American Behavioral Scientist•1979

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano1,5
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae