Competence to Bind the State to an International Engagement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9540045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Fairman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1936 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 439-462 |
| Publication date | 1936-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2191014 |
| OpenAlex | W2318823801 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
The purpose of this article is to inquire what is requisite to bind the state to an international engagement. We might ask what is the international effect of constitutional limitations on the power to make treaties, thus coming directly to the most controverted aspect of the problem. But there are also less formal agreements, as well as unilateral acts, all falling within one great category of negotia juris whose common characteristic is that they express the will of a state or states. In the following discussion we shall say simply “act,” meaning thereby an official act whose purpose is to create, alter, or extinguish rights in international law
Competence (human resources · Epistemology · International law · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Power (physics · Rules of engagement · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2006 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |