Individual Applications Under the European convention on Human Rights and the Concept of Administrative Practice
The Donnelly Case
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9541364 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kathleen Boyle (0000-0001-6538-1471, autor correspondente), Kevin Boyle, Hurst Hannum |
| Ano | 1974 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 440-453 |
| Data de publicação | 1974-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2200514 |
| OpenAlex | W2313645803 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
The most distinctive feature of the European Convention on Human Rights is the optional procedure under Article 25, whereby an individual claiming to be a victim of a violation of one of the rights guaranteed by the Convention may present a complaint against his own (or another) government to the European Commission of Human Rights for investigation. Thus the individual is given direct access to an international tribunal and is recognized as having the standing necessary to pursue his rights under international law
Commission · Complaint · Convention · Fundamental rights · Government (linguistics · Human rights · International human rights law · Political science · Tribunal · European and International Law Studies · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,04 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1977 - 1977 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |