Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evidence, the Court, and the Nicaragua Case

Bibliographic Data

ID9543304
AuthorsKeith Highet (American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume81
Issue1
Pages1-56
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2202130
OpenAlexW2330386867
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited8

The decision in the Nicaragua case is one of the most important judgments ever delivered by the International Court. It is by far the “heaviest” case, in the parlance of the English barrister, ever decided by the Court in the absence of a party. It has broken new ground for the application of Article 53 of the Statute. It deals in detail with the multilateral treaty reservation of the United States (the “Vandenberg amendment”). It contains provocative reasoning about the genesis and maintenance of rules of customary international law, separate from treaties such as the United Nations Charter. It contains seminal findings on the use of force and the exercise of the inherent right of self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter. It presents fresh and doubtless controversial interpretations of the principle of nonintervention. It prescribes limits to “collective counter-measures” in response to conduct not deemed to amount to “armed attacks.”

Charter · International law · Political science · Politics · Reservation · Security council · Statute · Treaty · United Nations Charter · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • One State, one Seat, one Vote? Accommodating Sovereign Equality to International Organizations

    Open Access•Christian Tomuschat•Common European Legal Thinking•2015

  • Levels of Analysis and Variation in Civil War Violence and Restraint

    Open Access•Kai M Thaler•Journal of Global Security Studies•2024

  • The South China Sea dispute and the Philippines Arbitration Tribunal

    Mincai Yu•Australian Journal Of International…•2016

  • Toward the Study of Governmental Crime

    Open Access•David Kauzlarich, Ronald C Kramer et al.•Humanity & Society•1992

  • Appraising a Century of Scholarship in the American Journal of International Law

    Open Access•David J Bederman•American Journal of International…•2006

  • The International Court of Justice

    Open Access•Malcolm N Shaw•International and Comparative Law…•1997

  • Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context

    Open Access•Karen J Alter•European Journal of International…•2008

  • The Development of International Law by the International Court

    Carl Q Christol, Hersh Lauterpacht•The Western Political Quarterly•1959

  • South West Africa and the United Nations

    Rosalyn Higgins•International Affairs•1976

  • Non-appearance before the International Court of Justice

    Richard Kennedy Guelff, Richard Guelff•International Affairs•1985

  • The Law and Practice of the International Court

    Douglas H Johnson, D H N Johnson•International Affairs•1966

  • Evidence before International Tribunals

    Ian Brownlie, Durward V Sandifer•The American Journal of…•1977

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,21
Citation span1992 - 2024 (33)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae