The Venezuela-British Guiana Boundary Arbitration of 1899
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9543691 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clifton J Child (corresponding author), William Cullen Dennis |
| Year | 1950 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 720-727 |
| Publication date | 1950-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2194990 |
| OpenAlex | W2322801938 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
In his note on “The Venezuela-British Guiana Boundary Dispute,” (this JOURNAL, Vol. 43 (1949), pp. 523–530), Judge Otto Schoenrich publishes a memorandum by the late Severo Mallet-Prevost which, if it were the only evidence upon which the fairness of the arbitration of 1899 could be judged, would bring the justice of the award seriously into question. Fortunately, however, it is not necessary to rely either upon the recollections of Mr. Mallet-Prevost or upon the construction placed upon these and other facts relating to the boundary dispute by Judge Schoenrich in order to learn the truth of how the Tribunal came to make its award. There are the voluminous files of the British Foreign Office on the arbitration to which reference may be made and there is the verbatim record of the Tribunal, taken down by six shorthand writers, printed day by day as the Tribunal sat, and then issued in 54 parts. There are also the files —often most informative—of contemporary newspapers (for the arbitration took place at the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the watchful eye of the press)
Action (physics · Arbitration · Boundary (topology · Economic Justice · Geography · Memorandum · Newspaper · Physics · Political science · Sociology · Tribunal · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Family and Matrimonial Law · Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America · History · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Mathematics
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1967 - 2020 (54) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |