The President’s Foreign Affairs Power
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9544338 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phillip R Trimble (University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 750-757 |
| Publication date | 1989-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2203363 |
| OpenAlex | W2322051685 |
| Language | EN |
In the wake of Vietnam and Watergate, Congress set out to attack the imperial Presidency and to recapture its “historic constitutional role” in foreign policy. The tools of congressional activism included the National Commitments Resolution, the War Powers Resolution, the Case Act, the legislative veto over arms sales and nuclear exports, trade restrictions aimed at the Soviet Union and regulation of intelligence activities. In response, Presidents Carter and Reagan charged that Congress was invading presidential prerogatives. Joined by former executive branch officials and academic commentators, they saw an imperial Congress and believed the solution was a strengthened Presidency
Executive branch · Executive power · Foreign policy · Legislature · National security · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidency · Presidential system · Veto · Vietnam War · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|