The Monetary Gold Principle
Back to Basics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9544534 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zachary Mollengarden (All Things Bugs (United States), corresponding author), Noam Zamir (0000-0001-5132-9496, Université catholique de lyon) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41-77 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ajil.2020.86 |
| OpenAlex | W3093705475 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
In The Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 , the International Court of Justice concluded that it cannot decide a dispute in which a third party's legal interests “would form the very subject-matter of the decision.” This Article argues that what has become known as the Monetary Gold principle conflicts with the Court's obligation to decide cases submitted by consenting parties and should be abandoned
Economic Justice · Economics · International court · International law · Law and economics · Obligation · Political science · Public international law · Subject (documents · Subject matter · Computer Science · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |