Discovery of Documentary and Other Evidence in a Foreign Country
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9544710 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert B von Mehren (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 896-902 |
| Publication date | 1983-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2202547 |
| OpenAlex | W2329799351 |
| Language | EN |
There are substantial differences between attitudes in the United States and those in foreign jurisdictions towards litigation in general and pretrial discovery in particular. Thus, in the United States, there is a breadth of pretrial discovery that cannot be found in any other legal system. Moreover, factual investigation in the United States is largely controlled and conducted by the attorneys for the litigants rather than by the judiciary which, in many other legal systems, is responsible for such investigations in a litigated matter
Documentary evidence · Political science · Criminal Law and Evidence · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |