Attachment to the Principles of the Constitution” as Judicially Construed in Certain Naturalization Cases in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9544769 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henry B Hazard (United States Department of Labor, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1929 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 783-808 |
| Publication date | 1929-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2189745 |
| OpenAlex | W2328005239 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that Madam Rosika Schwimmer, avowed “ uncompromising pacifist,” is not eligible to become a citizen of the United States has focused attention upon our naturalization laws and their judicial construction. Especial interest has been aroused in those provisions which prescribe the qualifications concerning the applicant's attachment to the principles of the Constitution of the United States
Citizenship · Constitution · Naturalization · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · International Law and Aviation · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
| Citations per year | 0.01 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1942 - 1942 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |