Extraterritoriality in China

Bibliographic Data

ID9544801
AuthorsHarold Scott Quigley
Year1926
Volume20
Issue1
Pages46-68
Publication date1926-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2188806
OpenAlexW2322105544
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

Among the subjects tentatively suggested by the Government of the United States in September, 1921, to the governments invited to participate in a conference on “ Limitation of Armament” and on “ Pacific and Far Eastern Questions” was that of the application of the principles that might be decided upon in questions relating to China to the territorial and administrative integrity of that state. When the Committee on Pacific and Far Eastern Questions took up the general discussion of matters within its purview, the expressions of high intention toward China on the part of the different interested Powers were so unanimous that it was deemed advisable to draw up immediately a statement of principle embodying these sentiments. At the first meeting of the committee the Chinese delegation had presented a group of statements of principle, of which the first reads: “ The Powers engage to respect and observe the territorial integrity and political and administrative independence of the Chinese Republic,” and the fifth as follows: “ Immediately or as soon as circumstances will permit, existing limitations upon China's political, jurisdictional and administrative freedom of action are to be removed.”

Administration (probate law · China · Delegation · Extraterritoriality · General assembly · Government (linguistics · Independence (probability theory · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Statement (logic · Territorial integrity · Chinese history and philosophy · Economic Zones and Regional Development · Law · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub