U.S. Military Commissions
One of Several Options
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9545933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Matheson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 354-358 |
| Publication date | 2002-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2693930 |
| OpenAlex | W1974425897 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
At the time this essay is being written (in mid-February), much is still not known about the system of military commissions contemplated by the president’s Military Order of November 13, 2001, and about the circumstances in which such commissions will be used. For example, it is not yet clear what offenses will be tried, what rules of evidence will be adopted, whether the defendants’ choice of counsel will be restricted, and whether defendants will be able to pursue ajudicial appeal of their conviction or a collateral challenge to their detention. Presumably, these points will be clarified by further orders or regulations from the executive branch
Appeal · Business · Collateral · Collateral damage · Conviction · Criminal Conviction · Criminology · Executive branch · Executive order · Law and economics · Legislature · Order (exchange · Political science · Sociology · Criminal Law and Evidence · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2002 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |