Prospects for United States Ratification of Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9546547 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George H Aldrich (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 1991-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2203556 |
| OpenAlex | W2007353590 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, concluded in Geneva in 1977, is the most important treaty codifying and developing international humanitarian law since the adoption of the four Conventions themselves; and it is the first such treaty since 1907 to deal with methods and means of warfare and the protection of the civilian population from the effects of warfare. As such, its contributions to the law were long overdue and, on the whole, are both positive from the humanitarian point of view and practicable from the military point of view. Moreover, it offers the prospect of improved compliance with international humanitarian law, which would greatly benefit the victims of war and would bring the law in action closer to the law in the books. Yet, in January 1987, the President of the United States informed the Senate that he would not submit the Protocol to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification, calling it “fundamentally and irreconcilably flawed.” It is apparent that President Reagan’s decision resulted from misguided advice that exaggerated certain flaws in the Protocol, ignored the statements of understanding that would have remedied them, and misconstrued a humanitarian and antiterrorist instrument as one that could give aid and comfort to “terrorists.”
Geneva Conventions · International humanitarian law · International law · Political science · Politics · Population · Ratification · Sociology · Treaty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law
The Moral Arc of the Universe Bends Long but It Bends toward Justice”
Islam and international humanitarian law
The Hariri and Saddam tribunals
The 1977 Protocols
Asymmetrical war and the notion of armed conflict – a tentative conceptualization
The Protagonism of the USSR and Socialist States in the Revision of International Humanitarian Law
Controlling the Use of Force
Holding the Center of the Law of Armed Conflict
The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Determination of Illegal Combatants
Women and the Law of Armed Conflict
Blue Helmets, Red Flags
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2019 (23) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |