The Right of Appeal in Naturalization Cases in the Federal Courts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9547020 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henry B Hazard (Bureau of Labor Statistics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1927 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 40-52 |
| Publication date | 1927-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2188595 |
| OpenAlex | W2315384466 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The Supreme Court of the United States, by Mr. Justice Brandeis, recently handed down its decision in Tutun v . United States, and Neuberger v . United States. This is the latest of the important Supreme Court cases determining the law of naturalization, of citizenship, and of expatriation. During the past fifteen years they have comprised Johannessen v . United States, Mansour v . United States, Luria v . United States, Maibaum v . United States, Mackenzie v . Hare, United States v . Ginsberg, United States v . Ness, United States v . Morena, Ozawa v . United States, Yamashita v . Hinkle, United States v . Thind, Kaplan v . Tod, and Toyota v . United States
Appeal · Certiorari · Citizenship · History of the United States · Naturalization · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Uniform Code of Military Justice · International Law and Aviation · Law
| Citations per year | 0.01 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1942 - 1942 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |