Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Right of Appeal in Naturalization Cases in the Federal Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID9547020
AuthorsHenry B Hazard (Bureau of Labor Statistics, corresponding author)
Year1927
Volume21
Issue1
Pages40-52
Publication date1927-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2188595
OpenAlexW2315384466
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The Supreme Court of the United States, by Mr. Justice Brandeis, recently handed down its decision in Tutun v . United States, and Neuberger v . United States. This is the latest of the important Supreme Court cases determining the law of naturalization, of citizenship, and of expatriation. During the past fifteen years they have comprised Johannessen v . United States, Mansour v . United States, Luria v . United States, Maibaum v . United States, Mackenzie v . Hare, United States v . Ginsberg, United States v . Ness, United States v . Morena, Ozawa v . United States, Yamashita v . Hinkle, United States v . Thind, Kaplan v . Tod, and Toyota v . United States

Appeal · Certiorari · Citizenship · History of the United States · Naturalization · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Uniform Code of Military Justice · International Law and Aviation · Law

  • Denaturalization on the Ground of Disloyalty

    Open Access•Lawrence Preuss•American Political Science Review•1942

Citations per year0.01
Citation span1942 - 1942 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae