The Share of the President of the United States in a Declaration of War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9548699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simeon E Baldwin (Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1918 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-14 |
| Publication date | 1918-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2187610 |
| OpenAlex | W2062905966 |
| Language | EN |
A Subject of warm debate in the convention which framed the Constitution of the United States was where the power of making or declaring war should be vested. The committee of detail reported in favor of giving Congress power “to make war.” Pinkney opposed this on the floor, preferring to bestow it on the Senate. That this was also the view of Hamilton appears in the draft of a constitution which he gave to Madison, towards the close of the convention. In the debate on the report, Pinkney urged that it “would be singular for one authority to make war, and another, peace.” Butler, who followed him, thought the President was the proper depositary. It was then moved to make the clause read “to declare war,” instead of “to make war.” Gerry said that he had “never expected to hear in a republic a motion to empower the executive alone to declare war.” Mason thought that neither the executive nor the Senate could safely be intrusted with the power of war; and finally the word declare was substituted for make by the large majority of States
Constitution · Convention · Declaration · Inherent powers · Political science · Power (physics · Spanish Civil War · Subject (documents · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|