Pringle V. Ireland. Case C-370/12

Bibliographic Data

ID9549675
AuthorsChristoph Herrmann (0000-0003-1284-9178, University of Passau, corresponding author), Christoph W Herrmann
Year2013
Volume107
Issue2
Pages410-416
Publication date2013-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0410
OpenAlexW2254594803
LanguageEN
Citations received2

In the judgment Pringle v. Ireland , the full Court of Justice of the European Union (Court or ECJ) upheld the validity of the decision of the European Council enabling the simplified amendment of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union(TFEU). In its Decision 2011/199/EU, the Council had provided for the establishment of a permanent European Stability Mechanism (ESM) by those member states of the European Union (Union or EU) that had adopted the euroas their common currency and legal tender. The Court also found in this judgment that those member states had not violated EU law by negotiating and concluding the Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM Treaty). The Court based the latter finding on the long-awaited clarification of the scope and content of the TFEU’s “no-bailout clause” (Art. 125(1)), which had been the subject of intense controversies among legal scholars, in particular in Germany

Business · Economic Justice · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · International trade · Negotiation · Political science · Preliminary ruling · Scope (computer science · Treaty · Treaty of Lisbon · EU Law and Policy Analysis · European Monetary and Fiscal Policies · Law · Taxation and Legal Issues

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub