Covert Operations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9550571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lori Fisler Damrosch (Columbia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 795-805 |
| Publication date | 1989-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2203368 |
| OpenAlex | W4237725208 |
| Language | EN |
As the Constitution begins its third century, the system of congressional oversight of covert action is only in its second decade. In the ancient history of covert action—before the intelligence oversight reforms of the 1970s—Congress did not involve itself in covert operations. After giving the Central Intelligence Agency standing authority to “perform such other functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the National Security Council may from time to time direct,” Congress paid little attention to what the Executive did under this authority. The era of congressional noninvolvement came to an end with the Watergate disclosures of intelligence activities that many Americans found reprehensible, the ensuing investigations into assassination attempts and other controversial covert actions, and the adoption of a new statutory framework for congressional oversight of the intelligence agencies
Action (physics · Agency (philosophy · Constitution · Covert · Foreign policy · Intelligence analysis · National security · National Security Council · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Statutory law · United States National Security Agency · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Public Administration · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |