Equitable Solutions to the Maritime Boundary Dispute Between the United States and Canada in the Gulf of Maine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9551981 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sang-Myon Rhee (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 590-628 |
| Publication date | 1981-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2200687 |
| OpenAlex | W2318168327 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 2 |
The United States and Canada agreed, by the Boundary Settlement Treaty of March 29, 1979, to submit their decade-long dispute over the maritime boundary in the Gulf of Maine area to a Chamber of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or to an ad hoc court of arbitration. The treaty, however, has not yet taken effect because the interrelated Fisheries Agreement, which was concluded on the same day and was to take effect simultaneously, was Unilaterally scrapped by the United States Government on March 6, 1981, on grounds of its allegedly unfair and inflexible provisions. On April 29, the United States Senate unanimously adopted a resolution supporting the Government's position to delink the two treaties and to settle the maritime boundary problem first by a third-party procedure. Whether or not a new fisheries agreement is concluded in the near future, it is expected that the maritime boundary dispute will ultimately be resolved by binding third-party settlement. The purpose of this article is to examine the legal position taken by each Government regarding the maritime boundary issues, and to suggest equitable principles that should govern their resolution
Arbitration · Boundary (topology · Business · Dispute resolution · Government (linguistics · International court · International law · Maritime boundary · Political science · Position (finance · Public international law · Settlement (finance · Treaty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Space exploration and regulation
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 1982 - 2014 (33) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |