Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equitable Solutions to the Maritime Boundary Dispute Between the United States and Canada in the Gulf of Maine

Bibliographic Data

ID9551981
AuthorsSang-Myon Rhee (corresponding author)
Year1981
Volume75
Issue3
Pages590-628
Publication date1981-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2200687
OpenAlexW2318168327
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited2

The United States and Canada agreed, by the Boundary Settlement Treaty of March 29, 1979, to submit their decade-long dispute over the maritime boundary in the Gulf of Maine area to a Chamber of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or to an ad hoc court of arbitration. The treaty, however, has not yet taken effect because the interrelated Fisheries Agreement, which was concluded on the same day and was to take effect simultaneously, was Unilaterally scrapped by the United States Government on March 6, 1981, on grounds of its allegedly unfair and inflexible provisions. On April 29, the United States Senate unanimously adopted a resolution supporting the Government's position to delink the two treaties and to settle the maritime boundary problem first by a third-party procedure. Whether or not a new fisheries agreement is concluded in the near future, it is expected that the maritime boundary dispute will ultimately be resolved by binding third-party settlement. The purpose of this article is to examine the legal position taken by each Government regarding the maritime boundary issues, and to suggest equitable principles that should govern their resolution

Arbitration · Boundary (topology · Business · Dispute resolution · Government (linguistics · International court · International law · Maritime boundary · Political science · Position (finance · Public international law · Settlement (finance · Treaty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Space exploration and regulation

  • Ruling the Sea

    Stephen Nemeth, Stephen C Nemeth et al.•International Interactions•2014

  • Dividing Coastal Waters

    Open Access•William Samuelson, William F Samuelson•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1985

  • Power Sharing in the Law of the Sea

    Open Access•Philip Allott•American Journal of International…•1983

  • The Torres Strait Treaty

    Open Access•Henry Burmester•American Journal of International…•1982

  • Ocean Boundaries Between Nations

    Open Access•Jonathan I Charney•American Journal of International…•1984

  • Defining maritime boundaries

    Open Access•Joan Marshall•Canadian Geographies /…•2004

  • The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases—A Critique

    Open Access•Wolfgang Friedmann•American Journal of International…•1970

  • International Tribunals

    Erich Hula•Thought•1945

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,14
Citation span1982 - 2014 (33)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae